Best LLM SEO Tools in 2026: 8 Tools Compared

Otterly.AI is the easiest way to start LLM tracking without a large budget. Its Lite plan, priced at $29 per month, tracks 15 prompts daily across ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Perplexity and Copilot, with unlimited team members. That prompt count suits a brand tracking its core money queries and main competitors.

Higher plans add prompts and engines, including Claude, Gemini and Google AI Mode, plus content audits and briefs that turn a citation gap into a page fix. The seven-day free trial lets you test the data before paying. If you are new to LLM SEO, Otterly.AI gives you real data at the lowest cost on this list.

Peec AI focuses on clean, daily prompt analytics: which prompts mention you, where you rank in the answer, which sources the model cited, and how sentiment around your brand reads. Its Starter plan covers 50 prompts daily across three models of your choice, with unlimited users, which suits SEO teams and agencies that share reports with clients.

Pricing is the awkward part. Peec AI has published starter prices in euros in the past, around 85 euros per month, but its current public pricing is limited, so we list it as See website rather than repeating a figure that may have changed. Confirm the current price, prompt count and model choice before comparing it with Otterly.AI or ZipTie.

ZipTie, now at ziptie.ai, tracks your brand across up to seven AI search engines, depending on country and plan, and records the full answer plus the top organic results for each check. That pairing is useful, because it shows whether an AI answer cited you, ranked you, or did neither. You choose daily, weekly or monthly check frequency, so costs follow how often you actually need data.

Entry pricing starts from around $42.75 per month for a smaller prompt set, with usage-based scaling above that. ZipTie suits teams that want to pay for the prompts they track rather than a large flat plan. If your query list is focused and your budget is watched, ZipTie is a flexible middle option.

Semrush AI Visibility Toolkit, priced at $99 per month per domain, adds AI search tracking to the SEO suite many teams already use. It reports brand visibility, citations and competitor presence across AI surfaces, and sits next to keyword rankings, site audits and backlink data. That context helps teams connect AI visibility changes with classic SEO work.

The catch is per-domain pricing. Tracking five domains costs five times the Toolkit price, on top of the base Semrush plan, which starts at $139 per month for Pro. Semrush earns its place for teams already invested in its suite. Teams that only need LLM tracking will find Otterly.AI, Peec AI or ZipTie cheaper.

SE Ranking bundles AI visibility with its SEO platform, sold under the SE Visible name. Its AI plan, priced at $99 per month in published comparisons, covers 200 prompts daily across ChatGPT, Gemini, AI Mode, Perplexity and AI Overviews, which is a strong prompt count for the price. Rank tracking, site audits and competitor data sit in the same account.

Packaging is the detail to confirm, since AI visibility may be an add-on to a base SEO plan rather than included in every tier. For teams already using SE Ranking, adding AI tracking there avoids a second subscription. For new buyers, compare the combined SEO plus AI price against a dedicated tracker plus a separate rank tracker.

Profound is the enterprise choice in LLM SEO. Its free trial runs 50 prompts a day for seven days across ChatGPT, Gemini and Google AI Overviews, giving a fair test of data quality. Enterprise plans expand to up to nine answer engines, with answer-engine insights, prompt volume data, content agents and integrations with analytics and content delivery platforms.

The trade-off is the sales-led, quote-only model for brands, which slows down small teams that want self-serve pricing. Agency plans are priced per client workspace. Profound fits large brands and agencies that need broad coverage, deep data and reporting at scale, and can support an enterprise budget.

AthenaHQ stands out for model breadth: its Starter plan, priced at $295 per month, covers 11 models with 3,600 answers a month and unlimited seats. That breadth suits teams that want to compare how many different models answer the same questions, rather than tracking two or three engines deeply. A free Essential plan with a small credit allowance lets you test the platform first.

The credit model is the catch. Answers are counted against a monthly allowance, so a large prompt list checked daily can burn through credits faster than expected. Plan your prompt count and frequency before committing, and use the free tier to learn how many answers your list actually consumes. For broad coverage with an action layer, AthenaHQ is a strong mid-market pick.

LLMrefs suits teams that need breadth over speed. Its plan, priced at $79 per month, covers 500 prompts across 10 models with unlimited seats, which is far more prompts per dollar than most rivals. A free plan is also available for smaller lists. That makes it a good fit for brand monitoring across many queries, markets or competitors.

The trade-off is cadence: LLMrefs checks weekly, while Otterly.AI, Peec AI and ZipTie check daily. Weekly data suits trend reporting, but it will miss short-lived changes in fast-moving markets. If your queries change slowly and your list is large, LLMrefs is excellent value. If daily alerts matter, pay more for a daily tracker.